
World Heritage Watch (WHW), the international oversight network that monitors the condition of UNESCO World Heritage sites, has sounded the alarm over a controversial proposal to add a chattra finial to the main stupa of Borobudur, a ninth-century Mahayana Buddhist temple complex in Central Java, Indonesia.
Drawing on ground-level data from local scientists and conservators in the independent Berlin-based network’s 2026 annual report, the analysis calls on Indonesia to suspend all preparatory work related to the proposed chattra installation at Borobudur, arguing that the proposal could threaten the authenticity and integrity of the world’s largest Buddhist temple.
Borobudur, inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1991, was constructed during the reign of the Sailendra Dynasty in Central Java in the eighth and ninth centuries CE. Revered as one of the most significant Buddhist monuments in the world, the temple is recognized for its outstanding artistic, architectural, and spiritual value. Since 2023, the Indonesian government has been pursuing the installation of a bronze chattra, a tiered ceremonial parasol finial, on the existing stone spire of the mahastupa.
The renewed push to install a chattra at Borobudur stems from the belief that the temple’s spiritual symbolism is incomplete without the tiered finial that traditionally crowns many stupas. In Buddhist symbolism, the chattra represents protection, wisdom, compassion, and spiritual attainment. For many devotees, a stupa without a chattra is considered incomplete.
Supporters have argued for its restoration since the early 1900s, hoping to return a feature they view as central to Buddhist cosmology and ritual meaning. Critics counter that without firm archaeological evidence, the addition of a chattra risks altering the historical record and damaging the structural integrity of Borobudur’s mahastupa.
The proposed structure, named the “Chattra Triratna Dasabhumi,” stands 6.2 meters high, weighs approximately 800 kilograms, and would be anchored to the ancient stonework by eight stainless-steel chemical anchors set 300 millimeters deep with epoxy resin.
The analysis published in the WHW report—authored by Catalin Ivancov, a representative of ICOMOS Indonesia, the Indonesian national committee of ICOMOS (the International Council of Monuments and Sites), which has a special role as advisory body to UNESCO—raises four principal concerns.
First, Ivancov finds no complete archaeological documentation demonstrating that the stupa originally bore a chattra, which is required under UNESCO guidelines before any reconstruction may proceed. The report notes that Dutch engineer Theodoor van Erp, who led Borobudur’s first scientific restoration between 1907 and 1911, himself dismantled a tentative chattra reconstruction he had assembled, concluding that surviving chattra fragments found at the site were insufficient evidence to justify installation.
Second, Ivancov documents a significant procedural gap: no heritage impact assessment has been formally submitted to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, as required by the World Heritage Committee’s most recent decision on Borobudur. An internal assessment commissioned by Indonesia’s Ministry of Religious Affairs has not been made publicly available.
Third, the report raises structural concerns, citing a 2024 technical assessment by BRIN (Indonesian Research and Innovation Agency), which found the stonework of the main stupa to be fragmented and lacking structural interconnections. Given Indonesia’s location in one of the world’s most seismically active regions, the report also warns that adding a top-heavy load to a structurally compromised summit could directly threaten the monument’s Outstanding Universal Value.
Fourth, Ivancov questions the process driving the proposal. Government communications have framed the chattra as a means of attracting international pilgrims and tourists, in line with a national target of 17 million international visitors by end-2026. Ivancov situates this within a pattern the World Heritage Committee has repeatedly noted: significant works proceeding at Borobudur before appropriate assessments are completed.

Ivancov’s report emphasizes: “Not all Buddhist communities in Indonesia support the installation. Buddhist monks and the Young Buddhist Association have expressed that the chattra should only be installed if there is clear archaeological evidence and expert consensus. . . . Local communities in Borobudur village, such as the Ruwat Rawat Borobudur indigenous cultural association, have also called for postponement, noting the historical and authenticity stakes for the whole world, not just for Buddhist devotees.” (World Heritage Watch Report 2026)
Ivancov is a researcher specializing in archaeological heritage management in Southeast Asia, with a particular focus on Indonesia. He is a member of the ICOMOS Indonesia National Committee, a member of the International Committee on Archaeological Heritage Management (ICAHM), and the OCD/RBA ICOMOS Working Group on Rights-Based Approaches in Heritage.
The WHW report’s case is echoed by scholarly debate that has intensified in recent months. A peer-reviewed study published in 2025 in Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya of Universitas Indonesia found that the Sailendra stupa tradition—represented by contemporary monuments including Mendut, Sewu, Pawon, and Plaosan, built by the same dynasty within the same century as Borobudur—consistently produced stupas without chattras, suggesting the form was by design complete without a parasol superstructure.
ICOMOS Indonesia issued a formal Statement of Concern on 10 April 2026, submitted to the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, citing threats to the site’s authenticity and doubts about the transparency of the conservation process.
Proponents of the project, including Indonesia’s Ministry of Religious Affairs, have argued that the chattra fulfills the spiritual aspirations of the nation’s Buddhist community and that van Erp’s excavations at the summit, which recovered sector-shaped parasol stones, octagonal shaft fragments, and dowel-fitted components, provided genuine archaeological grounding for a finial structure.
Indonesia’s Minister of Culture, Fadli Zon, presented the proposal to UNESCO in Paris in April 2026, framing it as “living heritage” and committing to proceed carefully and on the basis of scientific assessment.
The installation of the chattra, initially planned for May this year to coincide with Vesak observances, has been postponed to August 2026.
Ivancov calls for all preparatory work to be suspended until a full independent heritage impact assessment is completed and reviewed through UNESCO procedures. His analysis argues that any assessment should address questions of heritage values, structural safety, archaeological evidence, reversibility, and the broader diplomatic implications of altering one of the world’s most important Buddhist monuments.
“Borobudur Temple Compounds is a World Heritage property belonging to all humanity,” the WHW report concludes. “As Indonesia itself declared at the outset of the international campaign to save Borobudur in the 1950s and 1960s, its stewardship is a responsibility shared globally. No fewer than 23 countries and international institutions contributed to the 1973–1983 restoration, giving the international community a legitimate interest in how the monument is managed.” (World Heritage Watch Report 2026)

Although Indonesia is home to the world’s largest Muslim population, it also maintains a long and diverse religious heritage. According to national statistics for 2024, Islam is practiced by 87.1 per cent of the population, while Christianity accounts for 10.5 per cent, Hinduism 1.7 per cent, and Buddhism approximately 0.7 per cent, or about two million people. Despite this relatively small contemporary community, Buddhism has deep historical roots in the Indonesian archipelago, flourishing under powerful kingdoms and dynasties such as Srivijaya and the Sailendra dynasty, whose patronage produced Borobudur itself. Today, Indonesian Buddhists include Mahayana, Theravada, and Vajrayana communities.
See more
World Heritage Watch
World Heritage Watch Reports
World Heritage Watch Report 2026
ICOMOS Indonesia
Related news reports from BDG
Young Buddhist Association of Indonesia Joins National Dialogue on Borobudur Chattra Restoration
Related features from BDG
Beyond van Erp: Why Borobudur’s Authentic Form Has Already Been Affirmed
Borobudur’s Lost Crown: Why Theodoor van Erp’s Words Matter Today










