FEATURES

What Use is Morality for Meditation?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
The
The “Ten Good Precepts” as posted on Mount Takao, Tokyo metropolitan area. Photo by Daniel Friedrich

In this essay, I would like to reflect on the relationship between meditation and morality. Is morality useful for meditation? Is meditation useful for morality? The easy answers to these questions are that, of course, mental discipline aids meditation, and mindfulness a moral life. In quite a few meditation manuals, such as “Zazengi” in Dōgen’s (1200–53) Shōbōgenzō (DZZ 1: 88-89), morality constitutes a preparatory stage of meditation. However, as in my essay “Meditation as moral training,” I would like to probe a little deeper and, in particular, focus on Dōgen’s interpretation of the famous verse 183: “Not to commit all evil, to perform numberless good, to purify the mind, that is the teaching of the Buddha.”* (DZZ 1: 277) I believe that reading Dōgen’s text in the 21st century provides us with a new perspective on moral theory as well as on meditation, and highlights the relationship between the two. Today’s reflections are based on my article “Meditation as Moral Training: Reading Dōgen’s “Shoakumakusa” in the light of his Meditation Manuals.” (Kopf 2012)

As soon as scholars of Buddhism and Buddhist practitioners raised in the Christian or Jewish traditions became interested in Buddhism, they began to ask whether or not Buddhist teachings provide moral theories or even ethical systems. For example, Inazō Nitobe (1862–1933), a Japanese Christian, wrote his famous Bushidō: The Soul of Japan in response to inquiries fielded by friends and colleagues during his time in Philadelphia as to whether the religious and philosophical traditions of Japan provide moral guidelines.

quote
The Dhammapada V. 183. Artwork by Bhikkhu Sammahita

In the last 30 years, Buddhist ethics has become an important field of study that has its own academic journal, the Journal of Buddhist Ethics, with scholars such as Damien Keown leading the way. Many of these explorations deal with the central conundrum that while it is hard to find ethical systems à la Immanuel Kant’s (1724–1804) deontology, Stuart Mill’s (1806–73) utilitarianism, or even Aristotle’s (fourth century BCE) virtue ethics in Buddhist texts, there is no doubt that there are ample moral guidelines** to be found in the Buddhist scriptures such as the Eightfold Path, the Five Precepts, the Six (or Ten) Perfections, and, of course, the above mentioned dictum of The Dhammapada. In his What the Buddha Thought, Richard Gombrich went so far as to claim that morality was one if not the central teaching of the Buddha.

To probe the relationship between morality and meditation,** I suggest exploring Dōgen’s “Shoakumakusa” in Shōbōgenzō (DZZ 1: 277–84), the fascicle that provides his interpretation of The Dhammapada. A close reading of this fascicle reveals two interesting facts. First there is a stark contrast to the original text of The DhammapadaThe Dhammapada implies a clear distinction between good and evil, “Shoakumakusa” does not; The Dhammapada asserts karmic causality, the “Shoakumakusa” seems to permit at least some exceptions to the law of causality; The Dhammapada insists that evil can only be stopped by good deeds, the “Shoakumakusa” claims, almost echoing chapter eight of the Vimalakīrti Nirdeśa Sūtra, that, sometimes, bodhisattvas violate the precepts to “perform numberless good;” and, finally, The Dhammapada enunciates that morality “is the teaching of the Buddha” while “Shoakumakusa” suggests that “whoever knows the three-year-old child, knows all buddhas of the three worlds.” (DZZ 1: 277–84)*** This is scandalous and seems to be at odds with the Buddha’s teachings.

At the same time, Dōgen’s treatment of the verse 183 of The Dhammapada reflects his meditation theory in general. In “Shoakumakusa,” Dōgen maintains that, not unlike the practice of “silent meditation” (Jpn. zazen), the embodiment of “not committing all evils” and of “performing numberless good” involves the practice of “all Buddhas and all ancestors,” evokes activity of the “seven Buddhas of old,” constitutes the “true transmission of the Buddhadharma,” comprises the activity of “presencing” (Jpn. genzō), and “exhausts all worlds,” “all times,” and “all realms.” (DZZ 1: 277–84) ****

pic3
Scene from the movie Running on Karma (Daai check liu), in which the main character, Big, realizes the truth of The Dhammapala. From shangols.canalblog.com

Elsewhere, I have argued that the various statements Dōgen fashions to interpret the Dhammapada reflect his fourfold interpretation of “Buddha-nature” (Jpn. busshō)***** and outline the process of meditation from a literal understanding of the precepts to a performative one. The latter highlights that morality constitutes constant practice in order “to liberate all sentient beings,” to paraphrase the Bodhisattva Vow: in some sense, morality is the practice of mindfulness and mindfulness the practice of morality.

This brings us, however, to the key phrase in Dōgen’s fascicle: “the adherence to the precepts by the śrāvakas (a Mahāyāna Buddhist term for Buddha’s disciples) corresponds to the violation of the precepts by the bodhisattvas.” (DZZ 1: 280) This claim is as stunning as it outrageous: how can adherence to the precepts be equivalent to the violation thereof? 

To understand this sentence, I recommend taking a step back to remember the purpose of the precepts: the alleviation of suffering. The precepts do not constitute a goal in themselves but provide a path; a vehicle to deeper wisdom, greater compassion, and less suffering. Similarly, the Vimalakīrti Nirdeśa Sūtra recounts that a bodhisattva, at times, breaks the precepts to liberate all sentient beings from suffering. Thus, the bodhisattvas also illustrate a path; a vehicle to deeper wisdom and greater compassion. In other words, both the śrāvakas and the bodhisattvas provide various paths/vehicles to liberation. Similarly, both morality and meditation (“purification of the mind”) constitute tools; “skillful means” (Skrt. upāya), to alleviate suffering. Thus understood, ethics does not comprise a separate, standalone discipline but a path—one of many—to the ideals outlined in many Buddhists texts: wisdom and compassion.

The Great Buddha of Nagoya at Tōgan-ji. Photo by Áskell Jónsson
The Great Buddha of Nagoya at Tōgan-ji. Photo by Áskell Jónsson

* All translations from the Japanese are mine.

** Of course, Buddhism is much more than meditation, but for the purpose of this essay, I will focus on the role of morality in Dōgen’s meditation theory.

*** See Kopf 2012, 346.

**** Here I paraphrase Kopf 2012, 345.

***** See Kopf 2012, 348–49. For an introduction to Dōgen’s concept of “Buddha-nature,” see Does a Philosopher Have Buddha-nature? (Buddhistdoor Global)

References

Dōgen zenji zenshū (Complete Works of Zen Master Dōgen). 2 volumes. Edited by Dōshū Ōkubo. 1969–70. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō. [Abbr. DZZ].

Gombrich, Richard. 2009. What the Buddha Thought. London: Equinox Publishing.

Kopf, Gereon. 2012. “Meditation as Moral Training: Reading Dōgen’s ‘Shoakumakusa’ in the light of his Meditation Manuals,” Buddhist Meditation: Text, Tradition and Practice, Edited by Charles Willemen and Ven. Khammai Dhammasamai. Mumbai: Somaiya Publication, December., pp 341–52.

Related features from Buddhistdoor Global

Related news from Buddhistdoor Global

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments